
President Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday “for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples,” the Nobel Committee said in Oslo.
What is my view here?
Well, I could sum it up using these two comments posted on the NYTimes article:
1) “President Obama is presenting the same two wars in the exact same way as President Bush. These people showed disdain for Bush , but now show loving affection for Obama — though there is no difference on either front of war. This is straight out of Orwell:
“War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength”. ” – Janice Johnson
2) “The Nobel Peace Prize should be a reward for actual accomplishments, and not just talk. [...] Honestly, what has he done for world peace yet? His accomplishments are nothing but talk, and often the wrong talk. Grandstanding to the Arab world at the expense of Israel, for example, has only resulted in a hardening of Arab intransigence. Waffling on Afghanistan has yielded even more bloodshed. No concrete progress has been made by President Obama in the crucial areas of climate control and environmental protection. Even his healthcare plans have been stymied. In fact, Obama is looking more and more like Jimmy Carter (another Nobel Peace Prize laureate whose much praised efforts actually led to more belligerency and less peace) every day. Finally This kind of award will allow the President to rest on his laurels, instead of really getting down to work.” – Larry Abramson
As the Nobel Committee said in Oslo, “for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples”, Obama has indeed made efforts to a world without nuclear weapons. (➞ embedded video)So, technically speaking, he completely deserves the price, as the USA resolution in the UN is the proof of Obama’s intentions to a shared commitment to the goal of a nuclear weapon-free world. It is still unclear whether the peace dove really will disarm the world, or the American troops will. Fact is, that still not all of the countries, such as China and Russia have expressed their commitment to this goal.

Alfred Nobel
On 27 November 1895, Alfred Nobel signed his last will and testament, giving the largest share of his fortune to a series of prizes, the Nobel Prizes. As described in Nobel’s will, one part was dedicated to “the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses”.
I think Obama is on the right way to do so, but only time will tell if he really is the man Alfred Nobel might have awarded.
Posted by federicolentini 
Posted by federicolentini 


Posted by federicolentini